[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <407790.1718801177@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:46:17 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
lkp@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: micro-optimize skb_datagram_iter
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 09:29:53 +0300 Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > > Probably because kmap() returns page_address() for non-highmem pages
> > > while kmap_local_page() actually returns a kmap address:
> > >
> > > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMAP_LOCAL_FORCE_MAP) && !PageHighMem(page))
> > > return page_address(page);
> > > return __kmap_local_pfn_prot(page_to_pfn(page), prot);
> > >
> > > so if skb frags are always lowmem (are they?) this is a false positive.
> >
> > AFAIR these buffers are coming from the RX ring, so they should be
> > coming from a page_frag_cache,
> > so I want to say always low memory?
> >
> > > if they can be highmem, then you've uncovered a bug that nobody's
> > > noticed because nobody's testing on 32-bit any more.
> >
> > Not sure, Jakub? Eric?
>
> My uneducated guess would be that until recent(ish) sendpage rework
> from David Howells all high mem pages would have been single pages.
Um. I touched the Tx side, not the Rx side.
I also don't know whether all high mem pages would be single pages. I'll have
to defer that one to the MM folks.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists