[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f98cf542-ca67-43e4-8a26-a809294cd1d8@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:34:15 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next 3/6] ice: Simplify bitmap
setting in adding recipe
From: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:11:54 +0200
> From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Remove unnecessary size checks when copying bitmaps in ice_add_sw_recipe()
> and replace them with compile time assert. Check if the bitmaps are equal
> size, as they are copied both ways.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Co-developed-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c | 24 ++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
> index da065512889d..2f67fbb73fd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
> @@ -5067,6 +5067,10 @@ ice_find_free_recp_res_idx(struct ice_hw *hw, const unsigned long *profiles,
> return (u16)bitmap_weight(free_idx, ICE_MAX_FV_WORDS);
> }
>
> +/* For memcpy in ice_add_sw_recipe. */
> +static_assert(sizeof(((struct ice_aqc_recipe_data_elem *)0)->recipe_bitmap) ==
> + sizeof(((struct ice_sw_recipe *)0)->r_bitmap));
sizeof_field(struct ice_aqc_recipe_data_elem, recipe_bitmap) etc.
> +
> /**
> * ice_add_sw_recipe - function to call AQ calls to create switch recipe
> * @hw: pointer to hardware structure
> @@ -5187,13 +5191,9 @@ ice_add_sw_recipe(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_sw_recipe *rm,
> rm->root_rid = buf[0].recipe_indx;
> set_bit(buf[0].recipe_indx, rm->r_bitmap);
> buf[0].content.rid = rm->root_rid | ICE_AQ_RECIPE_ID_IS_ROOT;
> - if (sizeof(buf[0].recipe_bitmap) >= sizeof(rm->r_bitmap)) {
> - memcpy(buf[0].recipe_bitmap, rm->r_bitmap,
> - sizeof(buf[0].recipe_bitmap));
> - } else {
> - status = -EINVAL;
> - goto err_unroll;
> - }
> + memcpy(buf[0].recipe_bitmap, rm->r_bitmap,
> + sizeof(buf[0].recipe_bitmap));
> +
> /* Applicable only for ROOT_RECIPE, set the fwd_priority for
> * the recipe which is getting created if specified
> * by user. Usually any advanced switch filter, which results
> @@ -5256,14 +5256,8 @@ ice_add_sw_recipe(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_sw_recipe *rm,
> set_bit(entry->rid, rm->r_bitmap);
> }
> list_add(&last_chain_entry->l_entry, &rm->rg_list);
> - if (sizeof(buf[recps].recipe_bitmap) >=
> - sizeof(rm->r_bitmap)) {
> - memcpy(buf[recps].recipe_bitmap, rm->r_bitmap,
> - sizeof(buf[recps].recipe_bitmap));
> - } else {
> - status = -EINVAL;
> - goto err_unroll;
> - }
> + memcpy(buf[recps].recipe_bitmap, rm->r_bitmap,
> + sizeof(buf[recps].recipe_bitmap));
> content->act_ctrl_fwd_priority = rm->priority;
>
> recps++;
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists