netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] net: Split a __sys_bind helper for io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:06:37 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] net: Split a __sys_bind helper for io_uring

On 6/19/24 9:04 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 07:40:40 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 6/18/24 6:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 12:30:44 -0400 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:  
>>>> io_uring holds a reference to the file and maintains a
>>>> sockaddr_storage address.  Similarly to what was done to
>>>> __sys_connect_file, split an internal helper for __sys_bind in
>>>> preparation to supporting an io_uring bind command.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>  
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>  
>>
>> Are you fine with me queueing up 1-2 via the io_uring branch?
>> I'm guessing the risk of conflict should be very low, so doesn't
>> warrant a shared branch.
> 
> Yup, exactly, these can go via io_uring without branch juggling.

Great thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe