lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240618185247.060c183a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 18:52:47 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
 jiri@...nulli.us, pabeni@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
 hfdevel@....net, naveenm@...vell.com, jdamato@...tly.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 5/7] net: tn40xx: add basic Rx handling

On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 14:16:06 +0900 FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> +	netif_tx_lock(priv->ndev);
> +	while (f->m.wptr != f->m.rptr) {
> +		f->m.rptr += TN40_TXF_DESC_SZ;
> +		f->m.rptr &= f->m.size_mask;
> +		/* Unmap all fragments */
> +		/* First has to come tx_maps containing DMA */
> +		do {
> +			dma_unmap_page(&priv->pdev->dev, db->rptr->addr.dma,
> +				       db->rptr->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +			tn40_tx_db_inc_rptr(db);
> +		} while (db->rptr->len > 0);
> +		tx_level -= db->rptr->len; /* '-' Because the len is negative */
> +
> +		/* Now should come skb pointer - free it */
> +		dev_kfree_skb_any(db->rptr->addr.skb);
> +		netdev_dbg(priv->ndev, "dev_kfree_skb_any %p %d\n",
> +			   db->rptr->addr.skb, -db->rptr->len);
> +		tn40_tx_db_inc_rptr(db);
> +	}

Do you have to hold the Tx lock while unmapping the previous skbs?
That's the most expensive part of the function, would be good to let
other CPUs queue new packets at the same time.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ