netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: phy: add support for overclocked SGMII

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MeCcrvid=+KG-6Pe5_-u21PBJDdNCChVrib8zT+FUfPJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 21:29:03 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, 
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, 
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: phy: add support for overclocked SGMII

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 9:09 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:45:42PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > The Aquantia AQR115C PHY supports the Overlocked SGMII mode. In order to
> > support it in the driver, extend the PHY core with the new mode bits and
> > pieces.
>
> Here we go again....
>

Admittedly I don't post to net very often and I assume there's a story
to this comment? Care to elaborate?

Bart

> Is this 2500BaseX but without inband signalling, since SGMII inband
> signalling makes no sense at 2.5G?
>
>         Andrew