| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 12:53:13 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
CC: <alexandre.ferrieux@...nge.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<dccp@...r.kernel.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<fw@...len.de>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] Fix race for duplicate reqsk on identical SYN
From: luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 14:54:15 +0800
> 在 2024/6/18 01:59, Kuniyuki Iwashima 写道:
> > From: luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:56:40 +0800
> >> When bonding is configured in BOND_MODE_BROADCAST mode, if two identical
> >> SYN packets are received at the same time and processed on different CPUs,
> >> it can potentially create the same sk (sock) but two different reqsk
> >> (request_sock) in tcp_conn_request().
> >>
> >> These two different reqsk will respond with two SYNACK packets, and since
> >> the generation of the seq (ISN) incorporates a timestamp, the final two
> >> SYNACK packets will have different seq values.
> >>
> >> The consequence is that when the Client receives and replies with an ACK
> >> to the earlier SYNACK packet, we will reset(RST) it.
> >>
> >> ========================================================================
> >>
> >> This behavior is consistently reproducible in my local setup,
> >> which comprises:
> >>
> >> | NETA1 ------ NETB1 |
> >> PC_A --- bond --- | | --- bond --- PC_B
> >> | NETA2 ------ NETB2 |
> >>
> >> - PC_A is the Server and has two network cards, NETA1 and NETA2. I have
> >> bonded these two cards using BOND_MODE_BROADCAST mode and configured
> >> them to be handled by different CPU.
> >>
> >> - PC_B is the Client, also equipped with two network cards, NETB1 and
> >> NETB2, which are also bonded and configured in BOND_MODE_BROADCAST mode.
> >>
> >> If the client attempts a TCP connection to the server, it might encounter
> >> a failure. Capturing packets from the server side reveals:
> >>
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [S], seq 320236027,
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [S], seq 320236027,
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [S.], seq 2967855116,
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [S.], seq 2967855123, <==
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [.], ack 4294967290,
> >> 10.10.10.10.45182 > localhost: Flags [.], ack 4294967290,
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [R], seq 2967855117, <==
> >> localhost > 10.10.10.10.45182: Flags [R], seq 2967855117,
> >>
> >> Two SYNACKs with different seq numbers are sent by localhost,
> >> resulting in an anomaly.
> >>
> >> ========================================================================
> >>
> >> The attempted solution is as follows:
> >> In the tcp_conn_request(), while inserting reqsk into the ehash table,
> >> it also checks if an entry already exists. If found, it avoids
> >> reinsertion and releases it.
> >>
> >> Simultaneously, In the reqsk_queue_hash_req(), the start of the
> >> req->rsk_timer is adjusted to be after successful insertion.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: luoxuanqiang <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
> >> ---
> >> include/net/inet_connection_sock.h | 4 ++--
> >> net/dccp/ipv4.c | 2 +-
> >> net/dccp/ipv6.c | 2 +-
> >> net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> >> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >> 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> index 7d6b1254c92d..8ebab6220dbc 100644
> >> --- a/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> +++ b/include/net/inet_connection_sock.h
> >> @@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ struct dst_entry *inet_csk_route_child_sock(const struct sock *sk,
> >> struct sock *inet_csk_reqsk_queue_add(struct sock *sk,
> >> struct request_sock *req,
> >> struct sock *child);
> >> -void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> >> - unsigned long timeout);
> >> +bool inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
> >> + unsigned long timeout, bool *found_dup_sk);
> >> struct sock *inet_csk_complete_hashdance(struct sock *sk, struct sock *child,
> >> struct request_sock *req,
> >> bool own_req);
> >> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> >> index ff41bd6f99c3..13aafdeb9205 100644
> >> --- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> >> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> >> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> if (dccp_v4_send_response(sk, req))
> >> goto drop_and_free;
> >>
> >> - inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> >> + inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT, NULL);
> >> reqsk_put(req);
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> >> index 85f4b8fdbe5e..493cdb12ce2b 100644
> >> --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> >> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> >> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >> if (dccp_v6_send_response(sk, req))
> >> goto drop_and_free;
> >>
> >> - inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
> >> + inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT, NULL);
> >> reqsk_put(req);
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> >> index d81f74ce0f02..2fa9b33ae26a 100644
> >> --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> >> +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
> >> @@ -1122,25 +1122,32 @@ static void reqsk_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t)
> >> inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(oreq->rsk_listener, oreq);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static void reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
> >> - unsigned long timeout)
> >> +static bool reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
> >> + unsigned long timeout, bool *found_dup_sk)
> >> {
> > Given any changes here in reqsk_queue_hash_req() conflicts with 4.19
> > (oldest stable) and DCCP does not check found_dup_sk, you can define
> > found_dup_sk here, then you need not touch DCCP at all.
>
> Apologies for not fully understanding your advice. If we cannot modify
> the content of reqsk_queue_hash_req() and should avoid touching the DCCP
> part, it seems the issue requires reworking some interfaces. Specifically:
>
> The call flow to add reqsk to ehash is as follows:
>
> tcp_conn_request()
>
> dccp_v4(6)_conn_request()
>
> -> inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add()
>
> -> reqsk_queue_hash_req()
>
> -> inet_ehash_insert()
>
> tcp_conn_request() needs to call the same interface inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add()
> as dccp_v4(6)_conn_request(), but the critical section for installation check and
> insertion into ehash is within inet_ehash_insert().
> If reqsk_queue_hash_req() should not be modified, then we need to rewrite
> the interfaces to distinguish them. I don't see how redefining found_dup_sk
> alone can resolve this conflict point.
I just said we cannot avoid conflict so suggested avoiding found_dup_sk
in inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add().
But I finally ended up modifying DCCP because we return before setting
refcnt.
---8<---
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
index ff41bd6f99c3..b2a8aed35eb0 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
@@ -657,8 +657,11 @@ int dccp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (dccp_v4_send_response(sk, req))
goto drop_and_free;
- inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT);
- reqsk_put(req);
+ if (unlikely(inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(sk, req, DCCP_TIMEOUT_INIT)))
+ reqsk_free(req);
+ else
+ reqsk_put(req);
+
return 0;
drop_and_free:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index d81f74ce0f02..7dd6892b10b9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -1122,25 +1122,33 @@ static void reqsk_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t)
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(oreq->rsk_listener, oreq);
}
-static void reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
+static bool reqsk_queue_hash_req(struct request_sock *req,
unsigned long timeout)
{
+ bool found_dup_sk;
+
+ if (!inet_ehash_insert(req_to_sk(req), NULL, &found_dup_sk))
+ return false;
+
timer_setup(&req->rsk_timer, reqsk_timer_handler, TIMER_PINNED);
mod_timer(&req->rsk_timer, jiffies + timeout);
- inet_ehash_insert(req_to_sk(req), NULL, NULL);
/* before letting lookups find us, make sure all req fields
* are committed to memory and refcnt initialized.
*/
smp_wmb();
refcount_set(&req->rsk_refcnt, 2 + 1);
+ return true;
}
-void inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
+bool inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add(struct sock *sk, struct request_sock *req,
unsigned long timeout)
{
- reqsk_queue_hash_req(req, timeout);
+ if (!reqsk_queue_hash_req(req, timeout))
+ return false;
+
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_added(sk);
+ return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(inet_csk_reqsk_queue_hash_add);
---8<---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists