netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Lag, Remove NULL check before dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <187e4082-c297-472d-9185-58f08572d68c@davidwei.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 22:40:04 -0700
From: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
To: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>, saeedm@...dia.com
Cc: leon@...nel.org, tariqt@...dia.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: Lag, Remove NULL check before dev_{put, hold}

On 2024-06-18 20:53, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> The call netdev_{put, hold} of dev_{put, hold} will check NULL, so there
> is no need to check before using dev_{put, hold}, remove it to silence
> the warning:
> 
> ./drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c:1518:2-10: WARNING: NULL check before dev_{put, hold} functions is not needed.
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9361
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c
> index d0871c46b8c5..a2fd9a84f877 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lag/lag.c
> @@ -1514,8 +1514,7 @@ struct net_device *mlx5_lag_get_roce_netdev(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>  	} else {
>  		ndev = ldev->pf[MLX5_LAG_P1].netdev;
>  	}
> -	if (ndev)
> -		dev_hold(ndev);
> +	dev_hold(ndev);

Looks safe, dev_hold() -> netdev_hold() which checks for ndev.

Reviewed-by: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>

>  
>  unlock:
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lag_lock, flags);