netdev - Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable tag between the Bluetooth and pwrseq branches for v6.11-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:35:33 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable tag between the Bluetooth and pwrseq
 branches for v6.11-rc1

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:00 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 4:54 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> <luiz.dentz@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bartosz,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:45 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 4:43 PM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
> > > <luiz.dentz@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Bartosz,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 3:59 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Marcel, Luiz,
> > > > >
> > > > > Please pull the following power sequencing changes into the Bluetooth tree
> > > > > before applying the hci_qca patches I sent separately.
> > > > >
> > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20240605174713.GA767261@bhelgaas/T/
> > > > >
> > > > > The following changes since commit 83a7eefedc9b56fe7bfeff13b6c7356688ffa670:
> > > > >
> > > > >   Linux 6.10-rc3 (2024-06-09 14:19:43 -0700)
> > > > >
> > > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > > >
> > > > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux.git tags/pwrseq-initial-for-v6.11
> > > > >
> > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 2f1630f437dff20d02e4b3f07e836f42869128dd:
> > > > >
> > > > >   power: pwrseq: add a driver for the PMU module on the QCom WCN chipsets (2024-06-12 09:20:13 +0200)
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Initial implementation of the power sequencing subsystem for linux v6.11
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
> > > > >       power: sequencing: implement the pwrseq core
> > > > >       power: pwrseq: add a driver for the PMU module on the QCom WCN chipsets
> > > >
> > > > Is this intended to go via bluetooth-next or it is just because it is
> > > > a dependency of another set? You could perhaps send another set
> > > > including these changes to avoid having CI failing to compile.
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, the pwrseq stuff is intended to go through its own pwrseq tree
> > > hence the PR. We cannot have these commits in next twice.
> >
> > Not following you here, why can't we have these commits on different
> > next trees? If that is the case how can we apply the bluetooth
> > specific ones without causing build regressions?
> >
>
> We can't have the same commits twice with different hashes in next
> because Stephen Rothwell will yell at us both.
>
> Just pull the tag I provided and then apply the Bluetooth specific
> changes I sent on top of it. When sending to Linus Torvalds/David
> Miller (not sure how your tree gets upstream) mention that you pulled
> in the pwrseq changes in your PR cover letter.
>
> Bart

Gentle ping.

Bart