[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66746dc815aa6_2bed872947b@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:58:32 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Ziwei Xiao <ziweixiao@...gle.com>,
Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>,
Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>,
Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net: ethtool: reduce RTNL pressure in
dev_ethtool()
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This series is inspired by Jakub feedback for one gve patch :
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240614192721.02700256@kernel.org/
>
> Refactor dev_ethtool() and start to implement parallel operations.
>
> Eric Dumazet (6):
> net: ethtool: grab a netdev reference in dev_ethtool()
> net: ethtool: add dev_ethtool_cap_check()
> net: ethtool: perform pm duties outside of rtnl lock
> net: ethtool: call ethtool_get_one_feature() without RTNL
> net: ethtool: implement lockless ETHTOOL_GFLAGS
> net: ethtool: add the ability to run ethtool_[gs]et_rxnfc() without
> RTNL
>
> include/linux/ethtool.h | 2 +
> net/core/dev.c | 10 +--
> net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Thanks Eric!
One small comment in the ethtool_ops field, but not important.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists