netdev - Re: [PATCH 06/17] 9p: Enable multipage folios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZnSV7TmLpmucb8el@codewreck.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:49:49 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
	Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
	Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] 9p: Enable multipage folios

Dominique Martinet wrote on Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 05:34:49AM +0900:
> David Howells wrote on Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:31:24PM +0100:
> > Enable support for multipage folios on the 9P filesystem.  This is all
> > handled through netfslib and is already enabled on AFS and CIFS also.
> 
> Since this is fairly unrelated to the other patches let's take this
> through the 9p tree as well - I'll run some quick tests to verify writes
> go from 4k to something larger

(huh, my memory is rotten, we were already aggregating writes at some
point without this. Oh, well, at least it doesn't seem to blow up)

> and it doesn't blow up immediately and push it out for 6.11

Queued for -next.

-- 
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus