[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Mc0wN=zkduCnKetXyMsuY2k-BzrZ19ehPDntZRDu_o6fA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:24:59 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: phy: aquantia: wait for FW reset before
checking the vendor ID
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 9:27 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 08:45:46PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > Checking the firmware register before it boots makes no sense, it will
> > report 0 even if FW is loaded. Always wait for FW to boot before
> > continuing.
>
> Please split this patch up. One patch which renames the method to the
> more generic aqr_ since it is used by more than aqr107. Then add the
> new use of it.
>
Will do.
> Is this actually a fix? What happens to the firmware if you try to
> download it while it is still booting? Or do you end up downloading
> firmware when it is not actually needed? Please expand the commit
> message.
>
It says '0' and the driver tries to load it from nvmem, then the
filesystem and bails-out after these two fail. I'll extend the commit
message.
Bart
> Andrew
>
> ---
> pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists