[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef3688fd-d1a5-4045-baa3-1d51c24045c9@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 08:15:48 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao.osdev@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ksummit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: best practices for using Link
trailers
On 6/22/24 7:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
>> I see some existing usage of the above style, but equally there's lots
>> of examples of footnote-style links without the Link: tag, eg:
> I moved from that to using Link: because checkpatch would complain about my long (URL) lines unless it had a Link tag :P
We know that checkpatch isn't perfect. It's safe to ignore such complaints.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists