[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2319d0d58ccd879ebbc47f368475240bf06870ff.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 17:08:32 +0800
From: Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Jakub Sitnicki
<jakub@...udflare.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Andrii
Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Mykola
Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP
Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo
<haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@...a.com>, Miao Xu
<miaxu@...a.com>, Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@...mail.com>, Tiezhu Yang
<yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Fixes for BPF selftests on Loongarch
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 16:29 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:25 PM Geliang Tang <geliang@...nel.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@...inos.cn>
> >
> > v2:
> > - add patch 2, a new fix for sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter.
> > - update patch 3, only test "sk->sk_prot->close" as Eric
> > suggested.
> > - update patch 4, use "goto err" instead of "return" as Eduard
> > suggested.
> > - add "fixes" tag for patch 1-3.
> > - change subject prefixes as "bpf-next" to trigger BPF CI.
> > - cc Loongarch maintainers too.
> >
> > BPF selftests seem to have not been fully tested on Loongarch. When
> > I
> > ran these tests on Loongarch recently, some errors occur. This
> > patch set
> > contains some null-check related fixes for these errors.
> Is the root cause that LoongArch lacks bpf trampoline?
No. These errors don't seem to be directly related to the lack of BPF
trampoline. I have indeed got some errors since lacking BPF trampoline,
which is probably like this:
test_dctcp:PASS:bpf_dctcp__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_dctcp:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
#29/1 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:FAIL
test_cubic:PASS:bpf_cubic__open_and_load 0 nsec
test_cubic:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
#29/2 bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:FAIL
test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:dctcp_skel 0 nsec
test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:bpf_dctcp__load 0 nsec
test_dctcp_fallback:FAIL:dctcp link unexpected error: -524
#29/4 bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:FAIL
test_write_sk_pacing:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec
test_write_sk_pacing:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
#29/6 bpf_tcp_ca/write_sk_pacing:FAIL
Thanks,
-Geliang
>
> Huacai
>
> >
> > Geliang Tang (4):
> > skmsg: null check for sg_page in sk_msg_recvmsg
> > skmsg: null check for sg_page in sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter
> > inet: null check for close in inet_release
> > selftests/bpf: Null checks for link in bpf_tcp_ca
> >
> > net/core/skmsg.c | 4 ++++
> > net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 3 ++-
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 16
> > ++++++++++++----
> > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists