[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tthg9hvv.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 11:19:08 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, <leitao@...ian.org>, <petrm@...dia.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] selftests: drv-net: add ability to schedule
cleanup with defer()
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com> writes:
> On 6/26/24 03:36, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
>> There is a global action queue, flushed by ksft_run(). We could support
>> function level defers too, I guess, but there's no immediate need..
>
> That would be a must have for general solution, would it require some
> boilerplate code at function level?
Presumably you'd need a per-function defer pool.
Which would be naturally modeled as a context manager, but I promised
myself I'd shut up about that.
>> + def __enter__(self):
>> + return self
>> +
>> + def __exit__(self, ex_type, ex_value, ex_tb):
>> + return self.exec()
>
> why do you need __enter__ and __exit__ if this is not a context
> manager / to-be-used-via-with?
But you could use it as a context manager.
with defer(blah blah):
do stuff
# blah blah runs here
IMHO makes sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists