[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240626-linux-udpgso-v2-0-422dfcbd6b48@cloudflare.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:51:25 +0200
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Lift UDP_SEGMENT restriction for egress
via device w/o csum offload
This is a follow-up to an earlier question [1] if we can make UDP GSO work with
any egress device, even those with no checksum offload capability. That's the
default setup for TUN/TAP.
Because there is a change in behavior - sendmsg() does no longer return EIO
error - I'm submitting through net-next tree, rather than net, as per Willem's
advice.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/87jzqsld6q.fsf@cloudflare.com/
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...udflare.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Changes in v2:
- Fixup ip link arguments order (Jakub)
- Describe performance impact compared to regular sendmsg (Willem)
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240622-linux-udpgso-v1-0-d2344157ab2a@cloudflare.com
---
Jakub Sitnicki (2):
udp: Allow GSO transmit from devices with no checksum offload
selftests/net: Add test coverage for UDP GSO software fallback
net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +--
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 8 +++++++
net/ipv6/udp.c | 3 +--
tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.c | 15 +++++++++---
tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso.sh | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists