[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240625190111.629f0be4@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:01:11 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: <Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net 02/11] selftest: af_unix: Add msg_oob.c.
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:45:55 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> We can use EXPECT_EQ() {} here, but for some test cases where TCP is
> buggy, I'd like to print the difference but let the test pass.
...
> I think we can convert it to EXPECT_EQ() {} in all places after
> fixing TCP side and removing tcp_incompliant{} uses in the test.
I see, makes sense
Powered by blists - more mailing lists