netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/7] net: pse-pd: Add new power limit get and set c33 features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240626102140.1aac4593@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 10:21:40 +0200
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Sai Krishna Gajula <saikrishnag@...vell.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Oleksij
 Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Thomas
 Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/7] net: pse-pd: Add new power limit get
 and set c33 features

On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 18:49:26 +0000
Sai Krishna Gajula <saikrishnag@...vell.com> wrote:

> > + * Return: 0 on success and failure value on error  */ int
> > +pse_ethtool_set_pw_limit(struct pse_control *psec,
> > +			     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> > +			     const unsigned int pw_limit)
> > +{
> > +	int uV, uA, ret;
> > +	s64 tmp_64;
> > +
> > +	ret = regulator_get_voltage(psec->ps);
> > +	if (!ret) {
> > +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
> > +			       "Can't read current voltage");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
> > +			       "Error reading current voltage");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}  
> 
> Is there any significance of checking "ret" value against '0' and '< 0'
> separately?  Just trying to understand, these checks reflect regulator
> failure etc..?

In fact having ret = 0 is not an error for regulator_get_voltage() but with a 0
value I can't calculate the currrent.
I will update the error message and return value:

NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Can't calculate the current, PSE voltage read is 0");
return -ERANGE;

>  [...]  
> Reviewed-by: Sai Krishna <saikrishnag@...vell.com>

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com