netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: net: convert enetc to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240627154419.GA3480309-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:44:19 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, krzk@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com, imx@...ts.linux.dev, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: net: convert enetc to yaml

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 03:38:48PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 1:25 PM Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com> wrote:
> 
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    ierb@...800000 {
> 
> Node names should be generic.

Yes, but what would that be for this block? Unless we have (or add) a 
documented name, then it doesn't matter too much.

Rob