[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62322e58-785d-4936-bc80-9858c412621f@denx.de>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:06:16 +0200
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@...s.st.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Jose Abreu
<joabreu@...opsys.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,PATCH 1/2] net: stmmac: dwmac-stm32: Add test to verify
if ETHCK is used before checking clk rate
On 6/27/24 10:49 AM, Christophe Roullier wrote:
> When we want to use clock from RCC to clock Ethernet PHY (with ETHCK)
> we need to check if value of clock rate is authorized
I think it would be better to add fullstop (.) here , and then continue:
If ETHCK is unused, the ETHCK frequency is 0 Hz and validation fails. It
makes no sense to validate unused ETHCK, so skip the validation.
> but we must add
> test before to check if ETHCK is used.
With the commit message updated a bit
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists