netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/xsk: Enhance batch size support with dynamic configurations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240627043548.221724-3-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 04:35:48 +0000
From: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@...el.com>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	bjorn@...nel.org,
	magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
	maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
	jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com,
	tushar.vyavahare@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/xsk: Enhance batch size support with dynamic configurations

Introduce dynamic adjustment capabilities for fill_size and comp_size
parameters to support larger batch sizes beyond the previous 2K limit.

Update HW_SW_MAX_RING_SIZE test cases to evaluate AF_XDP's robustness by
pushing hardware and software ring sizes to their limits. This test
ensures AF_XDP's reliability amidst potential producer/consumer throttling
due to maximum ring utilization.

Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@...el.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index 088df53869e8..8144fd145237 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ static int xsk_configure_umem(struct ifobject *ifobj, struct xsk_umem_info *umem
 	};
 	int ret;
 
+	if (umem->fill_size)
+		cfg.fill_size = umem->fill_size;
+
+	if (umem->comp_size)
+		cfg.comp_size = umem->comp_size;
+
 	if (umem->unaligned_mode)
 		cfg.flags |= XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG;
 
@@ -265,6 +271,10 @@ static int __xsk_configure_socket(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, struct xsk_umem_i
 		cfg.bind_flags |= XDP_SHARED_UMEM;
 	if (ifobject->mtu > MAX_ETH_PKT_SIZE)
 		cfg.bind_flags |= XDP_USE_SG;
+	if (umem->comp_size)
+		cfg.tx_size = umem->comp_size;
+	if (umem->fill_size)
+		cfg.rx_size = umem->fill_size;
 
 	txr = ifobject->tx_on ? &xsk->tx : NULL;
 	rxr = ifobject->rx_on ? &xsk->rx : NULL;
@@ -1616,7 +1626,7 @@ static void xsk_populate_fill_ring(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, struct pkt_stream
 	if (umem->num_frames < XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS)
 		buffers_to_fill = umem->num_frames;
 	else
-		buffers_to_fill = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
+		buffers_to_fill = umem->fill_size;
 
 	ret = xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&umem->fq, buffers_to_fill, &idx);
 	if (ret != buffers_to_fill)
@@ -2445,7 +2455,7 @@ static int testapp_hw_sw_min_ring_size(struct test_spec *test)
 
 static int testapp_hw_sw_max_ring_size(struct test_spec *test)
 {
-	u32 max_descs = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS * 2;
+	u32 max_descs = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS * 4;
 	int ret;
 
 	test->set_ring = true;
@@ -2453,7 +2463,8 @@ static int testapp_hw_sw_max_ring_size(struct test_spec *test)
 	test->ifobj_tx->ring.tx_pending = test->ifobj_tx->ring.tx_max_pending;
 	test->ifobj_tx->ring.rx_pending  = test->ifobj_tx->ring.rx_max_pending;
 	test->ifobj_rx->umem->num_frames = max_descs;
-	test->ifobj_rx->xsk->rxqsize = max_descs;
+	test->ifobj_rx->umem->fill_size = max_descs;
+	test->ifobj_rx->umem->comp_size = max_descs;
 	test->ifobj_tx->xsk->batch_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
 	test->ifobj_rx->xsk->batch_size = XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS;
 
@@ -2461,9 +2472,12 @@ static int testapp_hw_sw_max_ring_size(struct test_spec *test)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Set batch_size to 4095 */
-	test->ifobj_tx->xsk->batch_size = max_descs - 1;
-	test->ifobj_rx->xsk->batch_size = max_descs - 1;
+	/* Set batch_size to 8152 for testing, as the ice HW ignores the 3 lowest bits when
+	 * updating the Rx HW tail register.
+	 */
+	test->ifobj_tx->xsk->batch_size = test->ifobj_tx->ring.tx_max_pending - 8;
+	test->ifobj_rx->xsk->batch_size = test->ifobj_tx->ring.tx_max_pending - 8;
+	pkt_stream_replace(test, max_descs, MIN_PKT_SIZE);
 	return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
index 906de5fab7a3..885c948c5d83 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ struct xsk_umem_info {
 	void *buffer;
 	u32 frame_size;
 	u32 base_addr;
+	u32 fill_size;
+	u32 comp_size;
 	bool unaligned_mode;
 };
 
-- 
2.34.1