[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e639c04e-ba84-43a0-b6e1-693cd1884798@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 21:42:13 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] s390/ism: Add check for dma_set_max_seg_size in
ism_probe()
> B) Under which circumstances would you become interested to increase the application
> of scope-based resource management here?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc5/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L8
Hi Markus
Please stop this. We have said a number of times, we don't want them
in existing code, at least not yet. Please come back in a couple of
years time once we know a bit more about how this helps/hinders.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists