[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240627161645.6c92d1ed@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:16:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Milena Olech <milena.olech@...el.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>, Przemek
Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Jacob Keller
<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Pucha Himasekhar Reddy
<himasekharx.reddy.pucha@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] ice: Fix improper extts handling
On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:36:00 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pf->ptp.info.n_ext_ts; i++) {
> > + if (pf->ptp.extts_channels[i].ena) {
> > + ice_ptp_cfg_extts(pf, i, &pf->ptp.extts_channels[i],
> > + false);
> > + }
> > + }
>
> nit: you don't need braces for single line statements.
>
> maybe you could rewrite it as below but i'm not sure if it's more
> readable. up to you.
>
> int i, cnt = pf->ptp.info.n_ext_ts;
>
> for (i = 0; i < cnt && pf->ptp.extts_channels[i].ena; i++)
> ice_ptp_cfg_extts(pf, i, &pf->ptp.extts_channels[i], false);
not sure this is functionally equivalent, but agreed on the point about
the braces.
Also, FWIW, the commit message doesn't read super well..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists