netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net/txgbe: add extra handle for MSI/INTx into thread irq handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240627164345.3273b3c2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 16:43:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 horms@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, mengyuanlou@...-swift.com,
 duanqiangwen@...-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] net/txgbe: add extra handle for MSI/INTx
 into thread irq handle

On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:07:03 +0800 Jiawen Wu wrote:
> Moreover, do not free isb resources in .ndo_stop, to avoid reading
> memory by a null pointer.

Please provide more detail on the sequence of events leading to the
null-defer.

>  	pdev->irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
> +	wx->num_q_vectors = 1;

this doesn't seem obviously related

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -2027,6 +2028,9 @@ int wx_setup_isb_resources(struct wx *wx)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = wx->pdev;
>  
> +	if (wx->isb_mem)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	wx->isb_mem = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
>  					 sizeof(u32) * 4,
>  					 &wx->isb_dma,
> @@ -2050,6 +2054,9 @@ void wx_free_isb_resources(struct wx *wx)
>  {
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = wx->pdev;
>  
> +	if (!wx->isb_mem)
> +		return;
> +

And neither does this. Why do you need to make these function
idempotent?
-- 
pw-bot: cr