[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf87c34e-a4ff-4e03-9d6a-dc365fec06a5@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 09:42:28 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, u-kumar1@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
geert+renesas@...der.be, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, nfraprado@...labora.com,
mturquette@...libre.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, arnd@...db.de,
richardcochran@...il.com, will@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add ipq9574 NSSCC clock and
reset definitions
On 27/06/2024 07:25, Devi Priya wrote:
>
>
> On 6/26/2024 10:56 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 09:35:20AM -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 20:02:59 +0530, Devi Priya wrote:
>>>> Add NSSCC clock and reset definitions for ipq9574.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in V5:
>>>> - Dropped interconnects and added interconnect-cells to NSS
>>>> clock provider so that it can be used as icc provider.
>>>>
>>>> .../bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.yaml | 74 +++++++++
>>>> .../dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h | 152 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>> .../dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h | 134 +++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 360 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.yaml
>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h
>>>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.h
>>>>
>>>
>>> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>>>
>>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>>
>>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>> Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,ipq9574-nsscc.example.dts:26.26-27 syntax error
>>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
>>
>> Hi Devi
>>
>> Version 4 of these patches had the same exact problem. There was not
>> an email explaining it is a false positive etc, so i have to assume it
>> is a real error. So why has it not been fixed?
>>
>> Qualcomm patches are under a microscope at the moment because of how
>> bad things went a couple of months ago with patches. You cannot ignore
>> things like this, because the damage to Qualcomm reputation is going
>> to make it impossible to get patches merged soon.
>>
> Hi Andrew,
> Very sorry for the inconvenience.
> I had run dt_binding_check locally on V4 patches and did not face any
> errors. I somehow missed to notice the binding check error that was
> reported on V4. Thus I went ahead and posted the same in V5.
> Will ensure such things are not repeated henceforth.
If the warning is expected, e.g. due to missing patches, it's beneficial
to mention this in the changelog (---). Otherwise all maintainers my
ignore your patch because you have issues reported by automation.
Anyway, up to you.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists