[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8cb43e8d-cb88-47c4-9fed-9de3b1be1e9e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:23:16 +0200
From: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@...il.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Build System <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PROBLEM] make randconfig: net/netfilter/core.c:830: undefined
reference to `netfilter_lwtunnel_fini'
On 6/27/24 22:44, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:30:24PM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
>> On 6/26/24 20:34, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/26/24 18:04, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 12:51:49AM +0200, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
>>>>> On 6/23/24 00:48, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/22/24 22:49, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a fix on the table address this, I will submit is in the next
>>>>>>> pull request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you very much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please consider adding Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@...il.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No big deal. Anytime :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please notify when I could test the same .config with your fix.
>>>>
>>>> Patch is here:
>>>>
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf.git/commit/?id=aef5daa2c49d510436b733827d4f0bab79fcc4a0
>>>
>>> Build error has gone, tested in the same environment. Please find the build output attached.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorov@69@...il.com>
>>
>> Apology, please, the right email is this:
>>
>> Tested-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@...il.com>
>
> Thanks a lot for testing.
Not at all - I think that testing whether the patch fixed the problem in the
initial environment adds to QA.
> Patch is already flying upstream, I missed adding this tag. But I
> could include your Reported-by: tag.
In the Internet space-time contiuum, you actually did not miss a thing,
because my testing is a logical consequence of your patch, and could not have
preceded it, so that the Tested-by would be in the original patch ;-)
As Lord Merovingi said, "cause and effect" ;-)
Best regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
Powered by blists - more mailing lists