netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] selftests: net: Switch pmtu.sh to use the internal ovs script.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240628163733.08077094@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:37:33 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pravin B
 Shelar <pshelar@....org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan
 <shuah@...nel.org>, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>, Adrián Moreno <amorenoz@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
 <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/7] selftests: net: Switch pmtu.sh to use
 the internal ovs script.

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 14:04:09 -0400 Aaron Conole wrote:
> > I also added the OvS tests themselves, and those are not passing, yet:
> > https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?test=openvswitch-sh
> > Could you take a look and LMK if these are likely env issues or
> > something bad in the test itself?  
> 
> I saw that.  I was looking for a place in the nipa repository where I
> could submit a small fix, because I noticed in the stdout:
> 
>   make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS="net/openvswitch"
>   TEST_PROGS=openvvswitch.sh TEST_GEN_PROGS="" run_tests
>   
> and I think the TEST_PROGS=openvvswitch.sh is misspelled (but it seems
> to not matter too much for the run_test target).

:o that's a weird bug, whatever is echoing back the input from the VMs
stdin to stdout is duplicating 74th character?! but as you say looks
like the VM gets the right input, it's just the echo.

> From what I understand, there are two things causing it to be flaky.
> First, the module detection is a bit flaky (and that's why it results is
> some 'skip' reports).  Additionally, the connection oriented tests
> include negative cases and those hit timeouts.  The default is to
> declare failure after 45s.  That can be seen in:
> 
>   https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/659601/91-openvswitch-sh/stdout
>   ...
>   # timeout set to 45
>   ...
>   # TEST: nat_connect_v4                                                [START]
>   # Terminated
>   # Terminated
> 
> This is showing that the timeout is too short.
> 
> I have patches ready for these issues, but I didn't know if you would
> like me to submit config 

config meaning make OvS built in? We have a number of tests using
module auto-loading, I don't think there were major issues with it.
(well, the rebuilding of modules is a bit questionable with vng,
but we do 'make mrproper' between each build to work around that).

> and settings files to go under net/openvswitch,
> or if you would prefer to see the openvswitch.sh script, and
> ovs-dpctl.py utilities move out of their net/openvswitch/ directory.  If
> the latter, I can submit patches quickly with config and settings (and a
> small change to the script itself) that addresses these.  If you'd
> prefer the former (moving around the files), I'll need to spend some
> additional time modifying pmtu and doing a larger test.  I don't have a
> strong opinion on either approach.

Since we talked about it a while back I gave in and implemented support
for combining multiple targets in a single runner. So it doesn't matter
any more (barring bugs in NIPA), up to you.