netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] wifi: brcmfmac: Add support for AP6275P

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:37:06 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
To: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>, robh@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, kvalo@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: efectn@...tonmail.com, dsimic@...jaro.org, jagan@...eble.ai,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 arend@...adcom.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 megi@....cz, duoming@....edu.cn, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 minipli@...ecurity.net, brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev,
 brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com, nick@...das.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] wifi: brcmfmac: Add support for AP6275P


Am 30.06.24 um 10:34 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> Am 30.06.24 um 09:36 schrieb Jacobe Zang:
>> diff --git
>> a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/include/brcm_hw_ids.h
>> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/include/brcm_hw_ids.h
>> index 44684bf1b9acc..c1e22c589d85e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/include/brcm_hw_ids.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/include/brcm_hw_ids.h
>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>>   #define BRCM_CC_43664_CHIP_ID        43664
>>   #define BRCM_CC_43666_CHIP_ID        43666
>>   #define BRCM_CC_4371_CHIP_ID        0x4371
>> +#define BRCM_CC_43752_CHIP_ID        43752
> I think this should be converted to hexadecimal to be consistent.
Sorry, please ignore this comment
>>   #define BRCM_CC_4377_CHIP_ID 0x4377
>>   #define BRCM_CC_4378_CHIP_ID        0x4378
>>   #define BRCM_CC_4387_CHIP_ID        0x4387
>> @@ -94,6 +95,7 @@
>>   #define BRCM_PCIE_4366_5G_DEVICE_ID    0x43c5
>>   #define BRCM_PCIE_4371_DEVICE_ID    0x440d
>>   #define BRCM_PCIE_43596_DEVICE_ID    0x4415
>> +#define BRCM_PCIE_43752_DEVICE_ID    0x449d
>>   #define BRCM_PCIE_4377_DEVICE_ID    0x4488
>>   #define BRCM_PCIE_4378_DEVICE_ID    0x4425
>>   #define BRCM_PCIE_4387_DEVICE_ID    0x4433
>