netdev - Re: XDP Performance Regression in recent kernel versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6fb46358-e92c-4264-9863-c011fa970478@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:25:46 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
 Samuel Dobron <sdobron@...hat.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 hawk@...nel.org
Cc: Sebastiano Miano <mianosebastiano@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...dia.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: XDP Performance Regression in recent kernel versions



On 24/06/2024 14:46, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Samuel Dobron <sdobron@...hat.com> writes:
> 
>>> It looks like this is known since March, was this ever reported to Nvidia back
>>> then? :/
>>
>> Not sure if that's a question for me, I was told, filling an issue in
>> Bugzilla/Jira is where
>> our competences end. Who is supposed to report it to them?
> 
> I don't think we have a formal reporting procedure, but I was planning
> to send this to the list, referencing the Bugzilla entry. Seems I
> dropped the ball on that; sorry! :(
> 
> Can we set up a better reporting procedure for this going forward? A
> mailing list, or just a name we can put in reports? Or something else?
> Tariq, any preferences?
> 
> -Toke
> 

Hi,
Please add Dragos and me on XDP mailing list reports.

Regards,
Tariq