netdev - [Bonding] Should we support qemu/virtio for 802.3ad mode?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZoKAt6ZkoCR2roEx@Laptop-X1>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 18:11:03 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Subject: [Bonding] Should we support qemu/virtio for 802.3ad mode?

Hi Jay,

Some one propose again[1] if we should support 802.3ad mode for virtio driver.
What do you think? Should we treat the SPEED_UNKNOWN as 1 or something else
in __get_link_speed()?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJO99TmB3957Wq3Cse7azgBxKeZ2BV6QihoyAsjUjyvzc-V8dQ@mail.gmail.com/

Thanks
Hangbin