| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202407012054.beATJPnF-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:48:06 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, kvalo@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, efectn@...tonmail.com,
dsimic@...jaro.org, jagan@...eble.ai, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arend@...adcom.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, megi@....cz, duoming@....edu.cn,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, minipli@...ecurity.net,
brcm80211@...ts.linux.dev, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
nick@...das.com, Jacobe Zang <jacobe.zang@...ion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] wifi: brcmfmac: Add optional lpo clock enable
support
Hi Jacobe,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on wireless-next/main]
[also build test WARNING on wireless/main rockchip/for-next robh/for-next linus/master v6.10-rc6 next-20240701]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jacobe-Zang/dt-bindings-net-wireless-brcm4329-fmac-add-pci14e4-449d/20240630-221025
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next.git main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240630073605.2164346-5-jacobe.zang%40wesion.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] wifi: brcmfmac: Add optional lpo clock enable support
config: sparc-allmodconfig
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407012054.beATJPnF-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c:37:
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c: In function 'brcmf_pcie_probe':
>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c:2426:33: warning: too many arguments for format [-Wformat-extra-args]
2426 | brcmf_dbg(PCIE, "enabling 32kHz clock\n", pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/debug.h:77:21: note: in definition of macro 'brcmf_dbg'
77 | fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
| ^~~
vim +2426 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
2400
2401 static int
2402 brcmf_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
2403 {
2404 int ret;
2405 struct brcmf_fw_request *fwreq;
2406 struct brcmf_pciedev_info *devinfo;
2407 struct brcmf_pciedev *pcie_bus_dev;
2408 struct brcmf_core *core;
2409 struct brcmf_bus *bus;
2410 struct clk *clk;
2411
2412 if (!id) {
2413 id = pci_match_id(brcmf_pcie_devid_table, pdev);
2414 if (!id) {
2415 pci_err(pdev, "Error could not find pci_device_id for %x:%x\n", pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
2416 return -ENODEV;
2417 }
2418 }
2419
2420 brcmf_dbg(PCIE, "Enter %x:%x\n", pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
2421
2422 clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(&pdev->dev, "lpo");
2423 if (IS_ERR(clk))
2424 return PTR_ERR(clk);
2425 if (clk) {
> 2426 brcmf_dbg(PCIE, "enabling 32kHz clock\n", pdev->vendor, pdev->device);
2427 clk_set_rate(clk, 32768);
2428 }
2429
2430 ret = -ENOMEM;
2431 devinfo = kzalloc(sizeof(*devinfo), GFP_KERNEL);
2432 if (devinfo == NULL)
2433 return ret;
2434
2435 devinfo->pdev = pdev;
2436 pcie_bus_dev = NULL;
2437 devinfo->ci = brcmf_chip_attach(devinfo, pdev->device,
2438 &brcmf_pcie_buscore_ops);
2439 if (IS_ERR(devinfo->ci)) {
2440 ret = PTR_ERR(devinfo->ci);
2441 devinfo->ci = NULL;
2442 goto fail;
2443 }
2444
2445 core = brcmf_chip_get_core(devinfo->ci, BCMA_CORE_PCIE2);
2446 if (core->rev >= 64)
2447 devinfo->reginfo = &brcmf_reginfo_64;
2448 else
2449 devinfo->reginfo = &brcmf_reginfo_default;
2450
2451 pcie_bus_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*pcie_bus_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
2452 if (pcie_bus_dev == NULL) {
2453 ret = -ENOMEM;
2454 goto fail;
2455 }
2456
2457 devinfo->settings = brcmf_get_module_param(&devinfo->pdev->dev,
2458 BRCMF_BUSTYPE_PCIE,
2459 devinfo->ci->chip,
2460 devinfo->ci->chiprev);
2461 if (!devinfo->settings) {
2462 ret = -ENOMEM;
2463 goto fail;
2464 }
2465
2466 bus = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
2467 if (!bus) {
2468 ret = -ENOMEM;
2469 goto fail;
2470 }
2471 bus->msgbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*bus->msgbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
2472 if (!bus->msgbuf) {
2473 ret = -ENOMEM;
2474 kfree(bus);
2475 goto fail;
2476 }
2477
2478 /* hook it all together. */
2479 pcie_bus_dev->devinfo = devinfo;
2480 pcie_bus_dev->bus = bus;
2481 bus->dev = &pdev->dev;
2482 bus->bus_priv.pcie = pcie_bus_dev;
2483 bus->ops = &brcmf_pcie_bus_ops;
2484 bus->proto_type = BRCMF_PROTO_MSGBUF;
2485 bus->fwvid = id->driver_data;
2486 bus->chip = devinfo->coreid;
2487 bus->wowl_supported = pci_pme_capable(pdev, PCI_D3hot);
2488 dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, bus);
2489
2490 ret = brcmf_alloc(&devinfo->pdev->dev, devinfo->settings);
2491 if (ret)
2492 goto fail_bus;
2493
2494 ret = brcmf_pcie_read_otp(devinfo);
2495 if (ret) {
2496 brcmf_err(bus, "failed to parse OTP\n");
2497 goto fail_brcmf;
2498 }
2499
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (808 bytes)
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (339736 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists