netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ptp: Add vDSO-style vmclock support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4d49e640143a557861a75a65678485965611b638.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2024 09:02:38 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,  linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, "Ridoux,
 Julien" <ridouxj@...zon.com>,  virtio-dev@...ts.linux.dev, "Luu, Ryan"
 <rluu@...zon.com>, "Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
 Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,  netdev@...r.kernel.org, Richard
 Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Thomas
 Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, Marc
 Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Daniel
 Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,  Alessandro Zummo
 <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
 Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ptp: Add vDSO-style vmclock support

On Sun, 2024-06-30 at 14:28 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> 
> W=1 allmodconfig builds with gcc-13 flag the following.
> Reading the documentation of strncpy() in fortify-string.h,
> I wonder if strscpy() would be more appropriate in this case.

It's never going to matter in practice, as the buffer is 32 bytes, so
"vmclock%d" would never get to the end even if was a 64-bit integer.

But as a matter of hygiene and best practice, yes strscpy() would be
more appropriate. Fixed in git, thanks.

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (5965 bytes)