[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66efa6eb-ed16-57b3-f490-8b3b4e6243f1@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 10:07:06 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, eddyz87@...il.com,
lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, toke@...hat.com, fw@...len.de, hawk@...nel.org,
horms@...nel.org, donhunte@...hat.com, memxor@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for
bpf_xdp_flow_lookup kfunc
On 6/29/24 10:11 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> On 6/14/24 5:40 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> [...]
>>> +void test_xdp_flowtable(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct xdp_flowtable *skel = NULL;
>>> + struct nstoken *tok = NULL;
>>> + int iifindex, stats_fd;
>>> + __u32 value, key = 0;
>>> + struct bpf_link *link;
>>> +
>>> + if (SYS_NOFAIL("nft -v")) {
>>> + fprintf(stdout, "Missing required nft tool\n");
>>> + test__skip();
>>> + return;
>>
>> Bit unfortunate that upstream CI skips the test case at the moment:
>
> yep, we are missing nft utility there.
Ok, not a blocker imho, but if you could work with Manu to get this
enabled in the CI, that would be great so that the test can actually
run.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists