lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <734a29a87613b9052fc795d56a30690833e4aba9.camel@ew.tq-group.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 12:03:01 +0200
From: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>
To: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Markus
	Schneider-Pargmann
	 <msp@...libre.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, Chandrasekar Ramakrishnan
 <rcsekar@...sung.com>, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,  Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Tony Lindgren
 <tony@...mide.com>, Judith Mendez <jm@...com>,  linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  linux@...tq-group.com
Subject: Re: Kernel hang caused by commit "can: m_can: Start/Cancel polling
 timer together with interrupts"

On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 07:37 +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01.07.24 16:34, Markus Schneider-Pargmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:12:55PM GMT, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> > > [CCing the regression list, as it should be in the loop for regressions:
> > > https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.html]
> > > 
> > > Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
> > > for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
> > > 
> > > Hmm, looks like there was not even a single reply to below regression
> > > report. But also seens Markus hasn't posted anything archived on Lore
> > > since about three weeks now, so he might be on vacation.
> > > 
> > > Marc, do you might have an idea what's wrong with the culprit? Or do we
> > > expected Markus to be back in action soon?
> > 
> > Great, ping here.
> 
> Thx for replying!
> 
> > @Matthias: Thanks for debugging and sorry for breaking it. If you have a
> > fix for this, let me know. I have a lot of work right now, so I am not
> > sure when I will have a proper fix ready. But it is on my todo list.
> 
> Thx. This made me wonder: is "revert the culprit to resolve this quickly
> and reapply it later together with a fix" something that we should
> consider if a proper fix takes some time? Or is this not worth it in
> this case or extremely hard? Or would it cause a regression on it's own
> for users of 6.9?
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten

Hi,

I think on 6.9 a revert is not easily possible (without reverting several other commits adding new
features), but it should be considered for 6.6.

I don't think further regressions are possible by reverting, as on 6.6 the timer is only used for
platforms without an m_can IRQ, and on these platforms the current behavior is "the kernel
reproducibly deadlocks in atomic context", so there is not much room for making it worse.

Like Markus, I have writing a proper fix for this on my TODO list, but I'm not sure when I can get
to it - hopefully next week.

Best regards,
Matthias



> 
> > > On 18.06.24 18:12, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> > > > Hi Markus,
> > > > 
> > > > we've found that recent kernels hang on the TI AM62x SoC (where no m_can interrupt is available and
> > > > thus the polling timer is used), always a few seconds after the CAN interfaces are set up.
> > > > 
> > > > I have bisected the issue to commit a163c5761019b ("can: m_can: Start/Cancel polling timer together
> > > > with interrupts"). Both master and 6.6 stable (which received a backport of the commit) are
> > > > affected. On 6.6 the commit is easy to revert, but on master a lot has happened on top of that
> > > > change.
> > > > 
> > > > As far as I can tell, the reason is that hrtimer_cancel() tries to cancel the timer synchronously,
> > > > which will deadlock when called from the hrtimer callback itself (hrtimer_callback -> m_can_isr ->
> > > > m_can_disable_all_interrupts -> hrtimer_cancel).
> > > > 
> > > > I can try to come up with a fix, but I think you are much more familiar with the driver code. Please
> > > > let me know if you need any more information.
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > 
> > 

-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
https://www.tq-group.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ