netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/47] arm64: qcom: dts: add QCS9100 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240703-manager-armless-b13b18c79192@wendy>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 07:28:53 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
	<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <djakov@...nel.org>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	<sboyd@...nel.org>, <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <will@...nel.org>, <joro@...tes.org>,
	<conor@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <amitk@...nel.org>,
	<thara.gopinath@...il.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	<wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, <linux@...ck-us.net>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
	<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	<robimarko@...il.com>, <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>,
	<bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, <kishon@...nel.org>,
	<quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>, <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
	<bvanassche@....org>, <agross@...nel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	<rui.zhang@...el.com>, <lukasz.luba@....com>, <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
	<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>,
	<otto.pflueger@...cue.de>, <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>, <luca@...tu.xyz>,
	<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
	<bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	<peppe.cavallaro@...com>, <joabreu@...opsys.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <kw@...ux.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	<ahalaney@...hat.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
	<quic_cang@...cinc.com>, <danila@...xyga.com>, <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>,
	<mantas@...vices.com>, <athierry@...hat.com>, <quic_kbajaj@...cinc.com>,
	<quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>, <quic_msarkar@...cinc.com>,
	<quic_devipriy@...cinc.com>, <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
	<quic_rgottimu@...cinc.com>, <quic_shashim@...cinc.com>,
	<quic_kaushalk@...cinc.com>, <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
	<quic_aiquny@...cinc.com>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	<kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/47] arm64: qcom: dts: add QCS9100 support

On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:45:00AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/07/2024 05:56, Tengfei Fan wrote:
> > Introduce support for the QCS9100 SoC device tree (DTSI) and the
> > QCS9100 RIDE board DTS. The QCS9100 is a variant of the SA8775p.
> > While the QCS9100 platform is still in the early design stage, the
> > QCS9100 RIDE board is identical to the SA8775p RIDE board, except it
> > mounts the QCS9100 SoC instead of the SA8775p SoC.
> 
> The same huge patchset, to huge number of recipients was sent twice.
> First, sorry, this is way too big. Second, it has way too many
> recipients, but this is partially a result of first point. Only
> partially because you put here dozen of totally unrelated emails. Sorry,
> that does not make even sense. See form letter at the end how this
> works. Third, sending it to everyone twice is a way to annoy them off
> twice... Fourth,
> 
> Please split your work and do not cc dozen of unrelated folks.

One of the extra recipients is cos that of that patch I sent adding the
cache bindings to the cache entry, forgetting that that would CC the
riscv list on all cache bindings. I modified that patch to drop the riscv
list from the entry.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)