[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ddc6c983-6975-4c6e-a612-74d957b01738@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 13:08:58 +0200
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<michael.chan@...adcom.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/11] eth: bnxt: use the indir table from
ethtool context
On 7/3/24 01:47, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Instead of allocating a separate indir table in the vnic use
> the one already present in the RSS context allocated by the core.
> This doesn't save much LoC but we won't have to worry about syncing
> the local version back to the core, once core learns how to dump
> contexts.
>
> Add ethtool_rxfh_priv_context() for converting from priv pointer
> to the context. The cast is a bit ugly (understatement) and some
could we wrap flex u8 data[] array of struct ethtool_rxfh_context
in an union with void *priv?, then no cast will be needed.
but I still would prefer to don't abuse ownership over in-core data,
and just keep it as inactive there, at the very end this could be
moved to devm_ to avoid leaks
> driver paths make carrying the context pointer in addition to
> driver priv pointer quite tedious.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> @@ -190,6 +190,11 @@ static inline void *ethtool_rxfh_context_priv(struct ethtool_rxfh_context *ctx)
> return ctx->data;
> }
>
> +static inline struct ethtool_rxfh_context *ethtool_rxfh_priv_context(void *priv)
> +{
> + return container_of((u8(*)[])priv, struct ethtool_rxfh_context, data);
> +}
> +
> static inline u32 *ethtool_rxfh_context_indir(struct ethtool_rxfh_context *ctx)
> {
> return (u32 *)(ctx->data + ALIGN(ctx->priv_size, sizeof(u32)));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists