netdev - Re: [PATCH net] act_ct: prepare for stolen verdict coming from conntrack and nat engine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <62019f02f20c09414a932987a191312ce55859d9.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:21:56 +0200
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, 
	jiri@...nulli.us, edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, Jakub Kicinski
	 <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] act_ct: prepare for stolen verdict coming from
 conntrack and nat engine

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 13:13 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de> wrote:
> > At this time, conntrack either returns NF_ACCEPT or NF_DROP.
> > To improve debuging it would be nice to be able to replace NF_DROP verdict
> > with NF_DROP_REASON() helper,
> 
> Sigh, this patch targets *net-next*, not net.

Given that the current ML traffic is manageable, would you mind re-
submitting for net-next, so it goes through the correct CI?

Thanks!

Paolo