[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240704072155.2ea340a9@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:21:55 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, <oss-drivers@...igine.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<louis.peens@...igine.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>, <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
<ryno.swart@...igine.com>, <ziyang.chen@...igine.com>, <linma@....edu.cn>,
<niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>, Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>, "Sebastian
Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ntp: fix size argument for kcalloc
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:17:39 +0200 Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> >> This patch is IMHO more a cleanup than a real fix. As such it's more
> >> suited for net-next. For the same reason I think it should not go to
> >> stable, so I'm dropping the fixes tag, too.
>
> I'm fine with targeting it at any of the trees.
>
> But I still believe it is a fix, even if a trivial one, and even if code
> "works" - it's a "wrong" code.
>
> Here I received similar feedback in a similar case:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org/msg03252.html
> and I changed my mind then.
Comments, docs, and the MAINTAINERS file are special.
This is actually changing the code, and at present results in the same
binary getting generated.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists