[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240705152138.GF1095183@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 16:21:38 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...dia.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: tls: Pass union tls_crypto_context pointer
to memzero_explicit
On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 03:54:59PM +0200, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> On 7/5/24 15:41, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Pass union tls_crypto_context pointer, rather than struct
> > tls_crypto_info pointer, to memzero_explicit().
> >
> > The address of the pointer is the same before and after.
> > But the new construct means that the size of the dereferenced pointer type
> > matches the size being zeroed. Which aids static analysis.
> >
> > As reported by Smatch:
> >
> > .../tls_main.c:842 do_tls_setsockopt_conf() error: memzero_explicit() 'crypto_info' too small (4 vs 56)
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> > Compile tested only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> one small nitpick only
...
> > @@ -710,7 +713,7 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, sockptr_t optval,
> > return 0;
> > err_crypto_info:
> > - memzero_explicit(crypto_info, sizeof(union tls_crypto_context));
> > + memzero_explicit(crypto_ctx, sizeof(union tls_crypto_context));
>
> nit: That's a good fix to aid static analyzers, and reviewers.
> Now it's also easy to follow the standard style and pass
> sizeof(*crypto_ctx) instead of the type.
Thanks, that is a good suggestion.
I'll incorporate it in a v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists