netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 iproute2 0/4] Multiple Spanning Tree (MST) Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240705204915.1e9333ae@hermes.local>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 20:49:15 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: roopa@...dia.com, razor@...ckwall.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, liuhangbin@...il.com, Tobias Waldekranz
 <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 iproute2 0/4] Multiple Spanning Tree (MST) Support

On Fri, 5 Jul 2024 18:53:47 -0600
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org> wrote:

> On 7/5/24 11:31 AM, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org wrote:
> > Hello:
> > 
> > This series was applied to iproute2/iproute2.git (main)
> > by Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>:
> >   
> 
> Why was this merged to the main repro? As a new feature to iproute2 this
> should be committed to next and only put in main on the next dev cycle.

Because the kernel support was already added, I prefer to not force waiting
for code that is non-intrusive and kernel support is already present.