[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL0PR11MB291354A0FED61B521DF1FDEFE7DA2@BL0PR11MB2913.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 18:33:17 +0000
From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To: <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<f.fainelli@...il.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<Arun.Ramadoss@...rochip.com>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <Yuiko.Oshino@...rochip.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: phy: microchip: lan937x: add support
for 100BaseTX PHY
Hi Oleksij,
Sorry for delayed reply. I was out of office from 7/4.
Seeing more version in this.
> anything in the register manual, MDIX status, no cable testing or
> counters. Do I hold it wrong? How about the T1 PHY? Are there anything
> beside cable testing and SQI?
>
I asked my colleague to check on your question. Please wait few days for reply if you are ok.
Thanks.
Woojung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists