[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240708.rootai6weiXe@digikod.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 21:45:42 +0200
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@...il.com>
Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@...gle.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] landlock: Abstract unix socket restriction tests
These are good tests! However, I get errors when running some of them (using
the latest formatted patches):
# RUN unix_socket.allow_without_domain_connect_to_parent.abstract_unix_socket ...
# ptrace_test.c:845:abstract_unix_socket:Expected 0 (0) == bind(self->server, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, addrlen) (-1)
# abstract_unix_socket: Test terminated by assertion
# FAIL unix_socket.allow_without_domain_connect_to_parent.abstract_unix_socket
not ok 9 unix_socket.allow_without_domain_connect_to_parent.abstract_unix_socket
# RUN unix_socket.allow_without_domain_connect_to_child.abstract_unix_socket ...
# ptrace_test.c:793:abstract_unix_socket:Expected 0 (0) == bind(self->server, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, addrlen) (-1)
# ptrace_test.c:826:abstract_unix_socket:Expected 1 (1) == read(pipe_child[0], &buf_parent, 1) (0)
# abstract_unix_socket: Test terminated by assertion
# FAIL unix_socket.allow_without_domain_connect_to_child.abstract_unix_socket
not ok 10 unix_socket.allow_without_domain_connect_to_child.abstract_unix_socket
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 05:30:48PM -0600, Tahera Fahimi wrote:
> Tests for scoping abstract unix sockets. The patch has three types of tests:
> i) unix_socket: tests the scoping mechanism for a landlocked process, same as
> ptrace test.
> ii) optional_scoping: generates three processes with different domains and tests if
> a process with a non-scoped domain can connect to other processes.
> iii) unix_sock_special_cases: since the socket's creator credentials are used for
> scoping datagram sockets, this test examine the cases where the socket's credentials
> are different from the process who is using it.
>
> Closes: https://github.com/landlock-lsm/linux/issues/7
> Signed-off-by: Tahera Fahimi <fahimitahera@...il.com>
> ---
> +/* clang-format off */
> +FIXTURE(optional_scoping)
> +{
> + int parent_server, child_server, client;
> +};
> +/* clang-format on */
> +
> +/* Domain is defined as follows:
> + * 0 --> no domain
> + * 1 --> have domain
> + * 2 --> have domain and is scoped
You should use an enum instead of these hardcoded values. This is
better to understand/document, to review, and to maintain.
> + **/
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT(optional_scoping)
> +{
> + int domain_all;
> + int domain_parent;
> + int domain_children;
> + int domain_child;
> + int domain_grand_child;
> + int type;
> +};
> +/*
> + * .-----------------.
> + * | ####### | P3 -> P2 : allow
> + * | P1----# P2 # | P3 -> P1 : deny
> + * | # | # |
> + * | # P3 # |
> + * | ####### |
> + * '-----------------'
> + */
> +/* clang-format off */
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(optional_scoping, deny_scoped) {
> + .domain_all = 1,
> + .domain_parent = 0,
> + .domain_children = 2,
> + .domain_child = 0,
> + .domain_grand_child = 0,
> + .type = SOCK_DGRAM,
> + /* clang-format on */
> +};
> +/*
> + * .-----------------.
> + * | .-----. | P3 -> P2 : allow
> + * | P1----| P2 | | P3 -> P1 : allow
> + * | | | |
> + * | | P3 | |
> + * | '-----' |
> + * '-----------------'
> + */
> +/* clang-format off */
> +FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(optional_scoping, allow_with_domain) {
> + .domain_all = 1,
> + .domain_parent = 0,
> + .domain_children = 1,
> + .domain_child = 0,
> + .domain_grand_child = 0,
> + .type = SOCK_DGRAM,
> + /* clang-format on */
> +};
I guess this should failed with the current kernel patch (see my review
of the kernel patch), but something like that should be tested:
FIXTURE_VARIANT_ADD(optional_scoping, allow_with_one_domain) {
.domain_parent = 0,
.domain_child = 2,
.domain_grand_child = 0,
};
grand_child should be able to connect to its parent (child), but not its
grand parent (parent).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists