[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<172063143182.19190.6752940637516779571.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:10:31 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: martin.lau@...ux.dev,
syzbot+608a2acde8c5a101d07d@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, andrii@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
kpsingh@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, sdf@...ichev.me,
sdf@...gle.com, song@...nel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev, tglx@...utronix.de, m.xhonneux@...il.com,
dlebrun@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:16:31 +0200 you wrote:
> The syzbot reported that the lwt_seg6 related BPF ops can be invoked
> via bpf_test_run() without without entering input_action_end_bpf()
> first.
>
> Martin KaFai Lau said that self test for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL
> probably didn't work since it was introduced in commit 04d4b274e2a
> ("ipv6: sr: Add seg6local action End.BPF"). The reason is that the
> per-CPU variable seg6_bpf_srh_states::srh is never assigned in the self
> test case but each BPF function expects it.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: Remove tst_run from lwt_seg6local_prog_ops.
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c13fda93aca1
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists