[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240711114535.pfrlbih3ehajnpvh@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:45:35 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Sudheer Mogilappagari <sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Subject: Netlink handler for ethtool --show-rxfh breaks driver compatibility
Hi,
Commit ffab99c1f382 ("netlink: add netlink handler for get rss (-x)") in
the ethtool user space binary breaks compatibility with device drivers.
Namely, before the change, ethtool --show-rxfh did not emit a
ETHTOOL_MSG_CHANNELS_GET netlink message or even the ETHTOOL_GCHANNELS
ioctl variant. Now it does, and this effectively forces a new
requirement for drivers to implement ethtool_ops :: get_channels() in
the kernel.
The following drivers implement ethtool_ops :: get_rxfh() but not
ethtool_ops :: get_channels():
- drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan743x_ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/chelsio/cxgb4/cxgb4_ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/falcon/ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena/ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ethtool.c
- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ethtool.c
Thus, for them, this is a breaking ABI change which must be addressed.
A demo for the enetc driver.
Before:
$ ethtool --show-rxfh eno0
RX flow hash indirection table for eno0 with 2 RX ring(s):
0: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
8: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
16: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
24: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
32: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
40: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
48: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
56: 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
RSS hash key:
0d:1f:cb:76:88:82:dd:ea:70:c9:ef:53:3e:f3:bf:60:5c:79:60:09:32:ff:88:fa:aa:39:63:31:ef:ad:31:e4:ac:57:ec:d2:09:4d:9a:01
RSS hash function:
toeplitz: on
xor: off
crc32: off
After:
$ ethtool --show-rxfh eno0
netlink error: Operation not supported
Sadly, I do not have the time to investigate a possible fix for this
issue, but I am more than happy to test out proposals.
Thanks,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists