[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b902cd1c-cd13-4bc2-b892-8f1174fdeed0@rbox.co>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 22:34:24 +0200
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kuniyu@...zon.com, Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com,
cong.wang@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 3/4] selftest/bpf: Parametrize AF_UNIX redir
functions to accept send() flags
On 7/9/24 11:59, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> I've got some cosmetic suggestions.
>
> Instead of having two helper variants - with and without send_flags - we
> could stick to just one and always pass send_flags. For readability I'd
> use a constant for "no flags".
>
> This way we keep the path open to convert
> unix_inet_skb_redir_to_connected() to to a loop over a parameter
> combination matrix, instead of open-coding multiple calls to
> unix_inet_redir_to_connected() for each argument combination.
All right, I think I was aiming for a (short term) churn reduction.
> It seems doing it the current way, it is way too easy to miss
> typos. Pretty sure we have another typo at [1], looks like should be
> s/SOCK_DGRAM/SOCK_STREAM/.
>
> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc7/source/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_listen.c#L1863
Yeah, looks like. I'll add a fix to this series.
> See below for what I have in mind.
Thanks, got it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists