lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240710174401.70e8f956@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:44:01 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Dan Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Leon
 Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, William Tu <witu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 01/10] net/mlx5: IFC updates for SF max IO
 EQs

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:08:31 +0000 Dan Jurgens wrote:
> > > Expose a new cap sf_eq_usage. The vhca_resource_manager can write this
> > > cap, indicating the SF driver should use max_num_eqs_24b to determine
> > > how many EQs to use.  
> > 
> > How does vhca_resource_manager write this cap?  
> 
> In most literal sense, MLX5_SET(cmd_hca_cap_2, hca_caps, sf_eq_usage, 1);. 
> 
> But getting there flows through:
> devlink port function set pci/0000:08:00.0/32768 max_io_eqs 32

Makes sense, include in the commit message, please?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ