netdev - [PATCH 7/7] xfrm: call xfrm_dev_policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240711100025.1949454-8-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 12:00:25 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Steffen Klassert
	<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] xfrm: call xfrm_dev_policy_delete when kill policy

From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>

xfrm_policy_kill() is called at different places to delete xfrm
policy. It will call xfrm_pol_put(). But xfrm_dev_policy_delete() is
not called to free the policy offloaded to hardware.

The three commits cited here are to handle this issue by calling
xfrm_dev_policy_delete() outside xfrm_get_policy(). But they didn't
cover all the cases. An example, which is not handled for now, is
xfrm_policy_insert(). It is called when XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY request is
received. Old policy is replaced by new one, but the offloaded policy
is not deleted, so driver doesn't have the chance to release hardware
resources.

To resolve this issue for all cases, move xfrm_dev_policy_delete()
into xfrm_policy_kill(), so the offloaded policy can be deleted from
hardware when it is called, which avoids hardware resources leakage.

Fixes: 919e43fad516 ("xfrm: add an interface to offload policy")
Fixes: bf06fcf4be0f ("xfrm: add missed call to delete offloaded policies")
Fixes: 982c3aca8bac ("xfrm: delete offloaded policy")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 5 ++---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c   | 1 -
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 475b904fe68b..10f68d572885 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -452,6 +452,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_destroy);
 
 static void xfrm_policy_kill(struct xfrm_policy *policy)
 {
+	xfrm_dev_policy_delete(policy);
+
 	write_lock_bh(&policy->lock);
 	policy->walk.dead = 1;
 	write_unlock_bh(&policy->lock);
@@ -1850,7 +1852,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, bool task_valid)
 
 		__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol);
 		cnt++;
 		xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, task_valid);
 		xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
@@ -1891,7 +1892,6 @@ int xfrm_dev_policy_flush(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
 
 		__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol);
 		cnt++;
 		xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, task_valid);
 		xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
@@ -2342,7 +2342,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *pol, int dir)
 	pol = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 	if (pol) {
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol);
 		xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
 		return 0;
 	}
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index e83c687bd64e..77355422ce82 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2455,7 +2455,6 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 					    NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
 		}
 	} else {
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(xp);
 		xfrm_audit_policy_delete(xp, err ? 0 : 1, true);
 
 		if (err != 0)
-- 
2.34.1