netdev - Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the bpf-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240712101711.272eda17@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 10:17:11 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Alexei Starovoitov
 <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, David Miller
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the bpf-next tree

Hi Alexei,

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:51:28 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Argh.
> So the fix was applied to bpf-next back in May and the same people
> come back to complain in July that it's somehow still broken and must be
> fixed in Linus's tree.
> So the new patch was applied to bpf and pulled to net
> and on the way to Linus now.
> 
> We will ffwd bpf-next in a day or so, if git cannot handle it,
> we will revert from bpf-next.

Don't bother, it is not causing any conflicts.  Occasional duplicates
like this are not really a problem.  I report them just in case they
were done in error.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped