lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240715173252.GA435752@bhelgaas>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:32:52 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
	andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com,
	Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>,
	Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@...adcom.com>,
	Hongguang Gao <hongguang.gao@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/9] bnxt_en: Remove BNXT_FLAG_USING_MSIX flag

On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 04:43:35PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> Now that we only support MSIX, the BNXT_FLAG_USING_MSIX is always true.
> Remove it and any if conditions checking for it.  Remove the INTX
> handler and associated logic.

The cover letter says new firmware (the revision isn't mentioned)
doesn't support INTx.  I guess it's OK if the new driver without INTx
support runs on adapters with old firmware that still supports INTx?
So the INTx support was never a real benefit?  I assume this driver
change won't force a simultaneous firmware update?  The old driver
might work in a "pci=nomsi" situation, but the new one probably won't?
Just checking to be sure these are all acceptable consequences.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ