lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZpVivaPpdiep9Oxr@x130.lan>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:56:13 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL mlx5-next] Introduce auxiliary bus IRQs sysfs

On 13 Jul 15:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:31:38 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> Following the review of v10 and Greg's request to send this via netdev.
>> This is a pull request that includes the 2 patches of adding IRQs sysfs
>> to aux dev subsystem based on mlx5-next tree (6.10-rc3).
>>
>> v10: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2024071041-frosted-stonework-2c60@gregkh/
>>
>> Please pull and let me know if there's any problem.
>
>Hi Saeed, when I pull this I get:
>
>  net/mlx5: Reimplement write combining test
>  RDMA/mlx5: Add Qcounters req_transport_retries_exceeded/req_rnr_retries_exceeded

Hi Kuba.
I thought Leon already sent one pull request with those, but maybe I was
mistaken, anyway they are needed for RDMA, this is why they are part of
mlx5-next. 

So yes please pull.

>  driver core: auxiliary bus: show auxiliary device IRQs
>  net/mlx5: Expose SFs IRQs
>
>and the subject says mlx5-next, so please confirm if you want me to
>pull this or there's another plan..

I see how this can be confusing, next time I will remove mlx5-next from
inside the brackets :).

Thanks,
Saeed.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ