netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 03/14] af_vsock: support multi-transport datagrams

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <85d64656-d8ff-1133-175f-b12f4913fccf@salutedevices.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 11:13:15 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...utedevices.com>
To: <stefanha@...hat.com>, <sgarzare@...hat.com>, <mst@...hat.com>,
	<jasowang@...hat.com>, <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<kys@...rosoft.com>, <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
	<decui@...rosoft.com>, <bryantan@...are.com>, <vdasa@...are.com>,
	<pv-drivers@...are.com>
CC: <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
	<oxffffaa@...il.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
	<jiang.wang@...edance.com>, <amery.hung@...edance.com>,
	<ameryhung@...il.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, kernel
	<kernel@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 03/14] af_vsock: support multi-transport
 datagrams

Hi! Sorry, i was not in cc, so I'll reply in this way :)

+static const struct vsock_transport *
+vsock_dgram_lookup_transport(unsigned int cid, __u8 flags)
+{
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
+
+	transport = vsock_connectible_lookup_transport(cid, flags);
+	if (transport)
+		return transport;
+
+	return transport_dgram_fallback;
+}
+
^^^

I guess this must be under EXPORT_SYMBOL, because it is called from
virtio_transport_common.c, so module build fails.

Thanks